The Mastermind Question That Cuts Through Every Dad's BS

I was thirty seconds into a polished update at my mastermind when one of the other founders cut me off. "Bob. What are you pretending not to know?" The room went quiet. I gave the question the laugh you give when you'd rather not answer it. He didn't laugh back. I sat there for another twenty seconds, then said the thing I'd been carrying around for three months but hadn't told anyone, including my wife. Two weeks later I made the call I'd been postponing. The peer who asked it didn't give me advice. He just asked the right question.

If you sit at a mastermind table and your business and your home life look basically the same as they did last quarter, your group is probably asking polite questions. This piece is about the best mastermind question for founders, what it is, why it works, and how to use it without turning your group into therapy or a hot-seat performance.

What is the best mastermind question for dads?

What is the best mastermind question for dads? The best mastermind question for dads is "What are you pretending not to know?" It bypasses the curated update and surfaces the thing you've already decided in your gut but haven't said out loud. It works because it doesn't ask for new information, it asks you to stop hiding the information you already have.

Every founder walks into a peer room or our event on Necker with a version of themselves the room is allowed to see. Revenue is up. The team is stronger. The new hire is "ramping." That version isn't a lie, it's the lit side of the moon. The dark side is the co-founder you should have fired last quarter, the marriage running on autopilot for six months, the round you're raising because you can't bring yourself to shut it down. That side is what the room is paying you to look at.

A great mastermind question flips you to the dark side without making you defensive. "What are you pretending not to know?" does that better than any other question I've heard in fifteen years of peer rooms.

Why "what's working / what's not?" usually fails

The default mastermind opener is some version of "What's working and what's not?" It sounds rigorous. It is actually safe. It lets the founder pick what to surface, and you'll always pick the thing you already have a plan for, because that's the thing that makes you look like a competent operator. The thing you don't have a plan for never makes the table.

Harvard Business Review on attention as the scarce resource for senior leaders makes the same point in a different domain: for senior leaders, the bottleneck isn't information, it's where you point your attention. The "pretending not to know" question doesn't ask for new information. It asks where you've already pointed your own attention and then looked away.

The question, broken down

Three words do the work in that sentence.

"Pretending." Not avoiding. Not struggling with. Not figuring out. Pretending. The word lands because you can't claim ignorance. You already know. You've just been performing not-knowing, to yourself, to your team, to your wife, to your investors.

"Not." This is the most important word in the question. Most peer questions look for what you don't see. This question looks for what you do see and have refused to act on. There's nothing for the room to teach you. There's only something for you to admit.

"Know." Not "feel," not "suspect," not "worry about." Know. The question assumes that on a quiet drive, with no audience, you already have a clear read on the situation. The mastermind isn't there to give you a read, it's there to make sure you say yours out loud.

You can't research your way out of it, networking-coffee your way out of it, or hire a consultant out of it. You can only answer it.

The one-question hot seat: a 3-step protocol

You don't need to redesign your mastermind to use it. Pick a meeting once a quarter and run what I call the one-question hot seat. It's three steps. It takes 25 minutes per founder. It is the most useful 25 minutes my group runs all year.

1. Ask, then shut up. One peer asks the founder on the hot seat: "What are you pretending not to know?" Then the room stays silent for at least 30 seconds. No follow-ups, no clarifying questions, no "I had something like that last year." The silence is doing the work, most founders need 20 seconds to stop performing before they can answer.

2. One round of witnessing, no advice. The founder talks for up to 10 minutes. The room listens without responding. When the founder is done, each peer says one sentence back, not advice, just what they heard. "I heard you say you've already decided to part ways with your co-founder and you're waiting for permission." That's it. The witnessing is what makes the room feel safe enough to keep going next time.

3. One ask, one commitment. The founder names one thing they will do in the next two weeks, and one thing they want the room to ask them about at the next meeting. Not a list. Not a roadmap. One move, one ask. Then move on to the next founder.

That's the protocol. No coach required, no outside facilitator. The structure is what makes the question safe to ask and impossible to dodge.

The night the question was asked at me

The peer who asked me wasn't trying to be clever. We were in our quarterly hot seat. I had just finished a clean five-minute update, revenue, hiring, a pilot about to close. He waited until I paused, then asked the question. I knew the answer the second he said it. I was pretending not to know that the deal we were optimizing for was the wrong deal, and that the right move was a different conversation with a different counterparty I'd been avoiding for two months because I didn't want to look like I'd been wrong.

I said it out loud. The room witnessed it without trying to fix it. I committed to having the new conversation within two weeks, and they asked me about it at the next meeting. The new conversation went well. The old deal would have gone fine for a year and then unraveled.

That's the dollar value of a good peer room: not advice, not introductions, not partnerships. It's the removal of the polite excuse for delay. The same dynamic shows up across the five locks that make men's groups stick, none of it is chemistry; all of it is structure that won't let you hide.

Common pitfalls when using the question

It looks simple. It is easy to ruin. Three patterns kill it in practice.

Asking it cold to someone you don't know. The question only works if there's enough trust in the room to take a real answer. Atlassian's writeup of Google's Project Aristotle names the precondition, psychological safety. If your group is new, run six months of normal updates first, then add the hot seat.

Treating it as a clever interview question. If the asker is performing, leaning back, half-smiling, savoring the silence, the question becomes adversarial and the founder shuts down. Ask it flat. Tone matters more than the words.

Following up with advice. The whole point is the founder already knows. As soon as the room jumps in with "have you tried X," the question becomes ordinary and the founder loses the moment to commit. Witness first. Advice, if it's needed, comes next meeting.

Frequently asked questions

What if I genuinely don't know what I'm pretending not to know? That answer is usually the answer. "I'm pretending not to know that I've been operating on willpower for nine months and I need to slow down before something breaks." If the answer is genuinely "nothing," your group probably hasn't built enough trust yet for the question to land.

Is this just a coaching question repackaged? Coaches have used variants for decades. The point isn't novelty; it's positioning. In a peer mastermind, this question replaces the safe "what's working / what's not" opener and turns the meeting from a status update into a decision.

How often should we run the one-question hot seat? Once a quarter, on the same meeting each quarter, with a 25-minute slot per founder. More often and it stops feeling like a hot seat. Less often and the group drifts back to comfortable updates.

The bottom line

A mastermind is only as useful as its hardest question. "What are you pretending not to know?" works because it doesn't try to be clever, it just refuses to let you hide from what you already know. Bring it to your next meeting, run the one-question hot seat once this quarter, and you'll know within an hour whether your peer room is a meeting or a brotherhood. If it's the first, fix the protocol. If it's the second, keep showing up.

Ready to sit at a table that asks the real questions? Apply to join REBL Dads or get more pieces like this in your inbox each week through the REBL Dads newsletter.

REBL Dads Editorial is the in-house byline for content from the REBL Dads community, a global, application-only brotherhood for founder-fathers who refuse to coast through life on autopilot.